Four play
Posted in Juggling on February 28th, 2010 by luke – Comments OffThroughout my time as a juggler, there have been what I consider to be great moments of personal discovery and accomplishment. Anyone who juggles can certainly identify with this feeling. It is the feeling that happens the first time you throw and catch three balls, and again when you realize you can continue to do this indefinitely.
It is the same sensation of limitless potential and effervescent joy I felt when I first flashed five. And again when I saw the pattern first becoming solid. It is a wonderful feeling, an up-swelling of self confidence and inspiration.
There is an undeniable commonality to these experiences, but there is also a nuance and individuality. All are similar, yet none are the same — in much the same way each of the patterns themselves have an individual identity, and yet they all share the innate quality of juggling.
My most recent moment of personal accomplishment — and perhaps one of my most profound personal juggling accomplishments to date — is four ball Mills Mess. I’ve always had a deep affinity for the Mills Mess patterns and their variants. Mills Mess feels almost like magic. It completely transforms the pattern with such subtlety that it it feels almost like cheating.
Most patterns or tricks distinguish themselves with broad, clear strokes. Throw heights or orders are altered, changing the tempo of the juggling that is happening — creating a syncopation, stealing time for a trick or flourish. Mills Mess isn’t like this.
Rather than the juggler altering the order or tempo of the pattern, in Mills Mess, the pattern manipulates the juggler. A three-ball Mills Mess has the exact tempo and siteswap of a standard cascade, yet through the twining and untwining of the juggler’s arms an entirely new, almost organic pattern is created.
Mills Mess has a smoother flow than any other pattern of which I know. The balls seem to chase and follow one another alternately, pulling the juggler’s arms into place at the pattern’s insistence. I make all of these observations based largely on my experience with three ball Mills. I feel, however, that with four these observations are, if anything, more apropos.
Three ball Mills Mess is a thing of beauty. It is a smooth and elegant pattern.
Four ball Mills is damn near poetic.
Like all even numbers, working with four is quirky. The base pattern comprises two independent circles. While they are in time with one another, they are fundamentally separate. There are, of course, patterns which alter this but they can never escape this fundamental characteristic — the natural rhythmic disorder which accompanies even-numbered juggling.
Yet if any pattern could be said to come close to erasing this disharmony, Mills Mess would be it.
Those distinct circles — two sets of two each bound with certainty to a pre-determined hand — merge in Mills Mess. They dance like lovers, boundaries rendered invisible yet kept intact. Every moment each half of the pattern shifting in compensation. Every prop seems lost in a miasmic tangle, and yet through it all each pair maintain their integrity. It’s a breakdown of dichotomy, a seemingly impossible union. It is all bound by the arms of the juggler and yet simultaneously it binds him, commands him. It demands a sort of liquidness — a fluidity of motion. It pulls the arms, constantly winding and unwinding those subordinate appendages to form a pattern of subtle and ever-changing complexity.
I’ve really only just broken into the pattern at this point, but I finally have a solid base to work from. It’s only a matter of time and practice before I can begin incorporating more variations, some simple siteswaps and really begin to delve into the depths of four ball Mills Mess dynamics.